Snapshot Chronicles

Susan Getgood's personal blog

  • Home
  • About Snapshot Chronicles
  • Privacy & Disclosure
    • Cookie Policy
  • Getgood.Com

Has Dooce become the modern day June Cleaver?

04.16.2009 by Susan Getgood //

Barbara Billingsley as June CleaverBefore I begin, full disclaimer. These are my thoughts, my feelings, my perceptions about gender stereotypes. Your Mileage May Vary.

I’m 46. As your mileage catches up to mine, you may  see my point of view  🙂  Or not.

Of late, the mainstream media has shifted its attention to the mom blogger. Whether it covers the Digital Mom (Today) or the Secret Lives of Moms (Oprah) , it seems to be focusing its “laser” attention on a new stereotype of moms.

A digital mom. Who seems to be in her early thirties, generally white and blond-ish, and blogging about her experiences — good,  sometimes bad, and occasionally whiny — as a mom. Played on TV,  generally, by Heather Armstrong (Dooce).

Don’t get me wrong. I love being a mom. I waited a long time to become one, and it was never certain that I would. My son is one of the most important things in my life.

But my experience of motherhood as a later in life mom with, at the time Douglas was born, a senior executive job at a technology company is very different than Heather’s.  I had to battle different things, including very real sexism on the job. I had to operate in a world where my joy in parenthood had to be tempered, because my male colleagues saw it as a weakness. They would never admit it, but oh my, was it clear.  Seen, not heard, baby.

I have tremendous respect for women who, like Dooce, have turned their motherhood into a money stream. God bless you and rock on as you rake it in. Not for me, but it works for you and I have no problem with it.

I’m also NOT proposing that mom bloggers stop sharing their stories in any way they wish on their blogs. Your life, your stories, your words, your right.

BUT….

Have we taken four steps forward and five steps back? Are we still letting mainstream media define us by our motherhood? Sure, it is not June Cleaver anymore; there’s a nod to diversity. A teeny weeny nod.

Nevertheless, the media seems to be re-focusing on women in a very traditional role of mother, tripping lightly over our other achievements.

Have we really come a long way, or are we back near the beginning?

Is this new perception of modern day moms damaging our ability to be perceived as women APART from our roles as mothers?  The media seems to be grabbing hold of an image of the digital mom that threatens to overwhelm our individual and collective achievements as professional women. To stuff us back in a gender-defined box.

How else to explain shows like “In the Motherhood” ? Or Oprah’s Secret Lives of Moms, which I did not watch because the show generally irritates me and I didn’t expect the mom episode to be much different. (Read some other moms who weren’t over the moon about Oprah).  Or the idea that Oprah’s foray into Twitter (lord help us) has something to do with soccer moms?

Is the digital mom becoming a new stereotype that will be just as damaging as June Cleaver?

I’m worried that the answer is yes.

Now, here’s where I put on my truly radical feminist hat. Be warned, and bear with me, as I am still thinking through this issue. I would love to hear your thoughts, whether you agree with me, think I am full of shit or something in between.

Is the mainstream media stuffing women, in general, back in the mommy box because the US power structure relies on women staying in their traditional gender role? To some degree, I think the answer is yes.

Those in power – mostly men – want to stay in power. Full stop. Individual women are allowed to break out of the mold – if they push push push hard enough, give up everything except their careers etc. They are allowed to be the rare exceptions – the Queen Bees.  They are unique.

Society doesn’t  acknowledge that women can be just as capable, competitive as male counterparts, and still be nurturers.  Moms. The successful woman is special. [Note: Women are also allowed to rise to the top if they embody the stereotype and use it to be successful. Mary Kay, Avon etc.]

The rest of us? At the core, The Powers That Be want – need  — us as a gender to stay in the traditional role as much as possible. Our economy is to some degree built on the assumption that we will. We can have jobs, but not the top jobs. Look at the tech industry – even the social media industry. At most conferences, most of the speaking slots are STILL filled by men. A smattering of token women, usually the same ones over and over. Because you know, they are special.

Even Michelle Obama, a very successful attorney in her own right,  has been completely redefined as a wife and mother. Don’t even get me started on how the  media has f-ed over Hillary Clinton. Would take multiple posts and only my policy wonk friends would stick it out.

The other side of this problem is the Madonna – Whore dichotomy. It often seems, women must be one or the other. Never both. Our society still has tremendous difficulty separating sex from biology. Consider breastfeeding. Biology, people. Mothers make milk and some choose to breastfeed their babies. Others don’t. Has NOTHING to do with sex. No need for blankets. Or embarassment. For anyone.

Yes,  this mom in the media trend makes me very uneasy. Tell me I’m wrong. I want to be wrong. I don’t think I am.

What do you think?

Categories // Blogging, Gender

Our experiences with The 39 Clues

04.04.2009 by Susan Getgood //

For Christmas last year we gave Douglas the first two books in The 39 Clues series,The Maze of Bones and One False Note.

While we had fun with the website over the holidays, he wasn’t too into the books. I read and enjoyed them, but couldn’t get him to read.

Until this week, when he got the third book, The Sword Thief. That seemed to motivate him to start reading, and once he got going with the tale, he was hooked.

Here’s my take on the series.

Yes, it’s largely about merchandising. Your experience on the website is much better if you are also reading the books and acquiring a certain number of the trading cards.

But it is entertaining. Doug and I spent at least an hour together online checking out the new stuff today. Most kids sites bore me, but this is fun for both of us.

It is something we can do together and that’s worth a lot.

Some of the missions seem unnecessarily difficult. For example, mission 3 (the snake charmer) which we did today. Much too hard for Douglas so I had to do it. I spent more than an hour at it, only to achieve it and have the system log me out before I could get the clue. Needless to say, not a happy mom. Another 30 minutes later, and we finally had the clue, but I wonder why Scholastic has made some of the tasks so challenging.

Shouldn’t it still be fun? Otherwise, why would we keep at it? And let me tell you, snake charmer was NO FUN.

We’ll keep at it, at least through the summer. But, Scholastic, please think about the kids. Don’t make the missions so hard that they can’t do them on their own.

Categories // Books, Douglas, Products Tags // 39 clues, Scholastic

My thoughts on the Battlestar finale, finally

04.02.2009 by Susan Getgood //

I can finally put some words around my feeling about the Battlestar Galactica finale.

First hour: everything I’ve come to expect from this show. In some places, maybe more. The way they wove all the stories together was superb.

Which was what made the second hour so very disappointing.

The action roared to a fever pitch. Starbuck dialed the FTL, and they were… at Earth?

Show could have ended for me right there. Because we didn’t get any more answers in that last hour than we had at that moment.

I remember my husband saying: so now it’s over. No, I replied, there’s another hour. 20 minutes later he asked again. So that’s it, right?

No.

But perhaps it should have been. Because except for a few moments — Roslin’s last flight and the Helo/Athena interplay — we didn’t get much in the way of answers or resolution.

Instead of a bang, it was a bit of a whimper.

I don’t even mind so much that we didn’t get a real resolution of the Lee/Kara storyline. Anyone a fan of that pairing saw *that* coming from two seasons away. I sort of stopped caring somewhere in mid-quadrangle of doom.

I’m not even that fussed that we never got a resolution of the Starbuck story. Who was she? I’m not sure I really care. It was still good TV. Most of the time.

Except for the last hour, that is. What bugged me was that it seemed so, pointless. We all knew Roslin was going to die. And Baltar was so slimy you knew, just knew that he’d make it.

I also have no real argument with any of the performances, even in that last oh so pointless hour. The storyline though? Not the best ever.

Battlestar has had good and bad eps in the past. It’s just too bad that one of the uneven, less shining moments was the last hour. Among other things, I must say “what the frak” to the following:

  • Hera’s big deal was to be mitochondrial Eve? Helo and Athena are what, cro-magnon pimps?
  • Tyrol went to be the father of all Celts? Explains a lot though I suppose.
  • Apollo was going to be the pre-historic Jeremiah Johnson? But would he eat pigeon pie?

Seriously, I loved this show. I still love this show.

But that last hour. Meh.

So say me all.

Categories // Science Fiction, TV/Film Tags // Battlestar Galactica

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • …
  • 105
  • Next Page »

Search

Posts

  • Cruise to the Mayan Ruins
  • Cruise Vacations: Hawaii, Bahamas, Caribbean
  • Paris: Panoramas, Gardens and … Catacombs?
  • Five Must See Museums in Paris
  • Paris: When to go, where to stay, what to eat
  • Reykjavik Restaurants Worth the Trip
  • Reykjavik: Favorite Museums
  • Susan and the Volcano: Hiking Fagradalsfjall
  • Reykjavik Summer Light – Top 5 Suggestions for Summer Days
  • Iceland: Tips for Viewing the Northern Lights from Reykjavik

Archive

Categories

Copyright © 2026 · Modern Studio Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

 

Loading Comments...