Snapshot Chronicles

Susan Getgood's personal blog

  • Home
  • About Snapshot Chronicles
  • Privacy & Disclosure
    • Cookie Policy
  • Getgood.Com

Season Finale Report Cards

05.25.2010 by Susan Getgood //

Well, the regular television season is over, and the summer season (Leverage, Eureka and Burn Notice) is soon to begin.

Here’s my report card on the season finales of the shows I regularly watch. Plus a comment on Lost, even though I was only a sporadic viewer.

Bones – B

The mystery in the season finale wasn’t that compelling and apparently main characters Booth and Brennan agreed, as they spent far more time discussing their sabbatical plans and avoiding the looming elephant in the room, their relationship, than actually investigating anything.  Subplot with Hodgins and Angela’s father (Billy Gibbons of  ZZ Top) was amusing and wrapped up a storyline begun the first time Hodgins and Angela planned to marry.

Hopefully, when the series returns in the Fall, the show will skip ahead the year and get back to solving crimes.

And seriously, why are shows so afraid of the so-called “Moonlighting” curse? Moonlighting went downhill because the principal actors Bruce Willis and Cybill Shepherd didn’t much like each other, not because it isn’t possible to let the leads get horizontal and still keep the stories fresh. In fact, two examples from my current viewing list are Chuck and Burn Notice, both of which manage to use external factors plus the normal tensions in ALL relationships to inject a little strife without destroying the couple.

Castle – B+

I’ll admit I was a bit distracted while watching the Castle finale. It was the night before a job interview out-of-town, I was trying to edit a chapter of my book, with one eye on the TV in my hotel room and the other on my netbook,  and I’d had a great dinner (and a few margaritas) with a good friend. Like Bones, relationship storyline trumped crime storyline, which means I couldn’t even remember what the crime was after little more than a week without double checking the website. Not good. I love the banter and the flirting between Castle and Beckett, and as noted above, I reject the notion that you can’t have horizontally ever after without screwing up (pun intended) the couple. It’s just not as easy as Unresolved Sexual Tension. Actress Stana Katic gets top marks for the last scene. Too little too late perhaps but her heartbreak was evident. To us, but not to Castle. Well done.

Chuck – A/A-

The two hour season finale and the ep the week before leading up to it were Awesome. This show just keeps getting better and better.   It would be so easy for the characters to remain the cartoon stereotypes they started as, and the show would probably still be decent. Instead, the writers and the actors have evolved the major characters, giving them a humanity and likability that can’t extend to pure stereotpyes, without diminishing  the essential components of the character. Casey is still a hard-ass, by the book  Marine, but we see his human side. And we know he is willing to throw away the book when necessary. Morgan is still nerdy and a little trollish, but he’s matured to a point where he can actually relate to people in distress (Devon and Alex) on a human level.

The A- part of  the grade is related to the character of Ellie, Chuck’s sister. She’s still mostly a stereotype. I don’t have too much of a problem with her forgetting that Casey was at her wedding with her father and thus, could have performed the nefarious deeds that the CIA/Ring double agent said he was planning a year ago. It was in the script.

I hated hated the guilt trip she put on her brother, asking Chuck to stop being a spy because she promised her father she would protect him. When they were little kids. Hello: your brother is a big boy now. You can’t live his life, and what is that crap about we’re all that’s left. What about your husband? Yeah, I know it’s in the script, and perhaps the Ellie character will get a grip and start her maturation process next season. Let’s hope so. Because it looks like Chuck is far from out of the spy game.

One last thing — What really rocks about the 3-ep arc that wrapped up the season is that it resolved the current major storylines.  Yes, there is a huge tease at the end that sets up a whole new storyline, but nothing old was left hanging. Had the show not been renewed, there was solid resolution for the fans. This show loves its fans, and it shows.

Fringe – A

I loved this show when it first started, but sort of lost interest after the first season. I was in Africa when the season began last Fall and I never got back into watching. But I’ve been recording it and periodically watching an ep when jogging on the treadmill, and decided to watch the two-ep season finale. All I can say is WOW!

One of the hallmarks of a truly good serial is that the episodes can also stand alone. Watching this two-parter, it would help to have the back story (which BTW they give you on the website if you want to catch up), but they gave you enough in these episodes that even if you had never watched an episode, I think you could enjoy the storyline.

And the ending –while I saw it coming — still rocked. Plus, Leonard Nimoy and John Noble together. Better than ANY of the romances.

But yeah, they threw the fans a bone on that score too.

The Mentalist – No grade

Honestly, I wasn’t paying too much attention when my son was watching The Mentalist finale, and I hadn’t seen the previous episode  either. The book again. When I catch up, I’ll do a better review. For now, I’ll just say that what I saw looked pretty good, probably an A-.

As for Lost, I watched the first season religiously but lost the plot, literally, after that. My husband was still watching, so I’d see an episode from time to time but I wasn’t “into” Lost. But I joined the rest of the world in watching the finale.

My first reaction — the ending was a Bobby in the shower moment. But upon reflection, no matter what they did, it would have been a disappointment for some and perfect for others. The best choice for the producers: split the difference and do what you like.

It was a pretty good couple of hours of TV. That’s really all I want — to feel like I haven’t wasted my time.

And you know, Hurley. You just can’t lose with Hurley.

If you haven’t seen them, here are the alternate endings from the Jimmy Kimmel show. You gotta love actors willing to spoof themselves.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Categories // TV/Film Tags // Bones, Burn Notice, Castle, Chuck, Fringe, Jimmy Kimmel, Leonard Nimoy, Lost, Mentalist, Television, Television program

SciFi Sunday: Initial thoughts on Doctor Number Eleven

04.18.2010 by Susan Getgood //

The Doctor is back.

Or rather, the 11th Doctor is here. With a new face and a new logo.

The first episode of the new series, “The Eleventh Hour,” aired Saturday night on BBC America at 9pm. It was preceded by an hour-long special that recapped the Doctor’s history, mostly focusing on recent Doctors Nine (Christopher Eccleston) and Ten (David Tennant).

I’ve been watching Doctor Who since I was my son’s age, and have liked some “regenerations” better than others. I loved Christopher Eccleston’s portrayal. On the other hand,  David Tennant’s Doctor was more like “Doctor Who Cares” for me, although I did try to watch whenever John Simm was on as The Master and loved the Doctor-lite episode “Blink” that introduced some of the scariest villains ever in the franchise, the Weeping Angels. Who will be back in two episodes this season.

Initial verdict on Number Eleven, Matt Smith: Very promising. I think I am going to enjoy his Doctor very much. He has the same edge that Eccleston’s Number Nine had. The new companion, Amy Pond, portrayed by actress Karen Gillan, also looks to be a very promising character, and the way they introduced her was excellent. It framed her character, and relationship with the Doctor, while simultaneously reminding us of the vagaries of time travel.

There’s also a nice nod toward the end of the episode to all the previous regenerations.

Doctor Who airs on BBC America at 9pm on Saturday night. We are two episodes behind the UK, so if you want a peek ahead, visit the BBC UK site.

More Clips from BBC America Site

“The Eleventh Hour”

“The Beast Below”

Categories // Science Fiction, TV/Film Tags // Doctor Who

Today show segment on negativity in the blogosphere

04.12.2010 by Susan Getgood //

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Last Friday, I was honored to be on the Today Show talking with Ann Curry and Isabel Kallman about negativity in the parenting blogosphere. Jen Singer of Momma Said was featured in the taped segment that introduced the topic.

I personally was very pleased with the balanced story that emerged during the segment. There have been so many negative stories about blogging and social media in the press, particularly about moms who blog. It was about time for a major media outlet to present a more balanced picture, and I am grateful to the Today Show for the opportunity to share my views.

There was so much to say, and so little time. Three and a half minutes is an eternity in broadcast, but not nearly enough. Here is what I would have said given unlimited time and a bully pulpit.

—

In any community — whenever and wherever people assemble around common interests — you’ll find the whole gamut of human experience. Love, hate, fights and friendships. Blogging is no different. Neither are moms. We’re human.

On any given day, read the comments on a sports or political blog, and you are bound to find more than a few “disagreements.” And then there’s the gossip sites like Perez Hilton. No shortage of trash talk and flame wars there. Even the comment sections of newspapers like the New York Times and the Detroit Free Press have seen their share of “attacks” in the comments.

And, no doubt about it, there is negativity in the parenting blogosphere. I do not know ANYONE who doesn’t have at least one troll story. However, negativity is not what defines the parenting blogosphere, and we rejected that hypothesis outright during the interview.

As Isabel said, the difference between the parenting community and other communities where passions can run high, is that the parenting community is also one of the most supportive online communities.

There are so many amazing stories of what women are doing online. Creating businesses and new ways to work together. Supporting each other through illness and tragedy. Using their own stories to call attention to social problems.  That’s the community I know.

When we started Blog With Integrity,  we were all about taking responsibility for what you say. We call it owning our words — even if we occasionally have to eat them. Part of owning your words is putting your name right next to your comments.

Anonymity has its place, but not when used as a weapon, the way online bullies so often do.

And even when attacks are not anonymous, the distance and immediacy of digital creates situations that probably would never occur in “real life.” We don’t always see the three-dimensional person who might be hurt. Our feelings are real — theirs, not so much. This is why the Blog With Integrity pledge includes a commitment to attack ideas, not people. It’s okay — even healthy — to disagree. But don’t make it personal.

When it comes down to it, it’s not at all surprising that passions and tempers can run high on blogs. People start blogs because they are passionate about something and want to share it with others.  I’m currently writing a For Dummies book about Professional Blogging, and have interviewed a number of successful bloggers for the book. They write about different things, and have different goals for their blogs, but the one thing that they all have in common is a passion for their topic.

The trick is to not take it personally and don’t make it personal. Because once it’s out there, it’s out there. Not forever, but as close to it as matters for practical purposes.

Do people who start or fan flame wars damage their own reputations? I think so. You can’t control what others say about you, but you can own your response to it. The best response to a troll is to ignore it. Let it fester away under its bridge.

This can be hard to do, especially when your blog is part of your business. The blog or person talking trash about you is damaging your ability to make a living. The temptation is strong to respond. Most of the time, you are better off ignoring it, and focusing your attention on your goals. Play your tune, don’t dance to someone else’s.

In fact, I had to take my own advice this morning when I read a comment on the Today Show site that called me a “phony specialist” for suggesting that it is better to attack the idea, not the person. Ah, the irony.

When shouldn’t you ignore it? Threats to your safety. Maybe libel, but tread carefully. It’s hard to prove and while the case lives so too do the libelous statements.

Women are saddled with some pretty potent stereotypes. June Cleaver, the perfect stay-at-home mom. The catty gossip — think “The Women.”

And my personal favorite: the double standard. Similar behavior from men and women is often described very differently. A strong woman is aggressive, a man, assertive. A man is opinionated. A woman, shrill. A man, driven. A woman, bitchy.

This is one of the reasons I think we see so many reality-TV type stories about women and women bloggers.

Women,  and especially moms, are STILL held to a subconscious societal standard for normative behavior. Stay at home. Don’t rock the boat. Work…but only if you have to. Be nice at all costs. Nurture nurture nurture.

How else to explain the continued discrepancy between male and female wages in this country. Or that Massachusetts could elect a lightweight like Scott Brown largely because voters didn’t “like” Martha Coakley.

When women do step out of the normative behavior — however they do it — society tries to apply old stereotypes to explain it. Women criticize each other online?  Ooh, that means all women bloggers are “mean girls.” Forget about the cesspool of negativity on political blogs. Or some of the infamous tech blogger flare-ups of the past few years. As my friend Elisa Camahort Page recently commented on BlogHer, if you want to see a real (tom) cat fight, just google “Loren Shel Puppet.”

And when that fails, the mainstream media  fosters new, largely negative stereotypes. For example, the entrepreneurial success of many mom bloggers was turned into a negative by the New York Times last month in its article Honey, Don’t Bother Mommy, I’m Too Busy Building My Brand. I can’t imagine someone writing a headline chastising a father for the same thing — finding new ways to support the family while developing a professional reputation or personal brand (whichever term you prefer).

Women don’t turn in our human credentials when we become mothers, and it is well past time to say goodbye to June.

But let’s not perpetuate old myths and replace her with a new monolithic stereotype of mothers, and especially mothers engaged online, as some sort of cross between Joan Crawford, Paris Hilton and Gwyneth Paltrow.

Women are doing amazing things with their blogs. Starting new businesses that never would have existed without the long tail of the Internet. Sharing their experiences, opinions and passions with others across the globe.

And raising families at the same time.

Imagine that.

Categories // Blogging, Gender, Interviews, Parent bloggers, TV/Film

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 19
  • Next Page »

Search

Posts

  • Paris: Panoramas, Gardens and … Catacombs?
  • Five Must See Museums in Paris
  • Paris: When to go, where to stay, what to eat
  • Reykjavik Restaurants Worth the Trip
  • Reykjavik: Favorite Museums

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Modern Studio Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in